Technology and implementation analysisTech · Animal · Global

Indonesia Is Practising the Handoffs Behind One Health Surveillance

Work on the SIZE platform focuses on how information moves between sectors. The next question is whether those handoffs become faster and more reliable.

Eli WardEditorial persona3 min read

A disease signal can arrive in one sector while the authority to investigate sits in another. Sharing it requires more than a place to upload a report.

WHO’s October 29 account describes September workshops in Indonesia involving human-health, animal-health and wildlife authorities. Participants reviewed workflows, clarified responsibilities and practised moving signals through the Information System for Zoonosis and Emerging Infectious Diseases, known as SIZE. The activities received Pandemic Fund support. WHO

SIZE is an existing platform. Wider subnational use, stronger risk assessments and improvements in documenting and acting on signals are described as next steps. WHO’s report does not provide a before-and-after evaluation demonstrating reduced response times or prevented outbreaks. WHO

Implementation analysis: That boundary is important. A platform can make information available without ensuring that someone acknowledges it, assesses it or has resources to respond.

A useful evaluation would follow the handoffs. How long passes between detection and reporting? Between reporting and assessment? When multiple agencies are involved, is there a named lead? Does the reporting team learn what happened next?

These are proposed measures, not results reported for SIZE.

Testing those steps in exercises can expose ambiguity before an emergency: a missing contact, an unclear escalation rule or two agencies each expecting the other to lead. Software may support the process, but governance determines who can make decisions.

Expansion also creates an evaluation challenge. More reports could mean better detection rather than more disease. Faster reporting could coexist with a bottleneck in investigation. Counting platform activity alone would miss both distinctions.

Indonesia’s workshops make the operational work visible. The next evidence should show whether agreed workflows survive routine use—especially at the local level, where a signal first becomes somebody’s responsibility.

Related on TiPH: Technology and health · How we verify signals · Global Signal Scan, October 29, 2026 · Latest news

IndonesiaOne HealthSIZE platformZoonosesSurveillance workflows
ShareShare on LinkedIn

How we reported this

Eli Ward is a TiPH editorial construct, not a real individual, and the byline is used as a recurring editorial pen-name for technology and implementation analysis. How reported: analysis of WHO's published account only. No interviews were conducted, no scenes or lived experience were invented, and TiPH did not perform an independent implementation audit or platform testing. Facts, analysis and uncertainty are labeled in the text. This article is AI-assisted and was reviewed and approved by Elijah St. John. Prepared for the October 29, 2026 edition and first published October 29, 2026.

Source notes

Corrections & updates

Substantive errors will be corrected and material updates identified.

Written by

Eli Ward

Editorial persona

The Futures Correspondent

The Futures Correspondent is the byline for coverage of what is coming next — emerging science, technology, space, and the frontier questions of public health.

  • Emerging science
  • Technology
  • Space

Eli Ward is a recurring editorial pen-name persona used by the Today in Public Health newsroom for emerging-science and futures coverage. It is not a real individual — no biography, credentials, employment history, or lived experience is implied or should be inferred. Every piece published under this byline is researched, written, and edited by real people who are accountable to our editorial standards.

Related stories